All Issue

2019 Vol.61, Issue 5 Preview Page
Response of Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI) and Canopy Temperature of Apple Tree to Irrigation Treatment Schemes

관개수준별 사과나무의 엽온 및 수분 스트레스 지수 변화 분석

Minyoung Kima
,
Yonghun Choib†
,
Junggun Choc
,
Seokkyu Yunc
,
Jeonghun Parkd
,
Youngjin Kima
,
Jonggil Jeona
,
Sangbong Leea
김 민영a
,
최 용훈b†
,
조 정건c
,
윤 석규c
,
박 정훈d
,
김 영진a
,
전 종길a
,
이 상봉a
aAgricultural Researcher, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)
bPost-doctoral Researcher, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)
cAgricultural Researcher, Department of Horticultural Crop Research, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Sciences (NIHHS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)
dResearcher, Department of Agricultural Engineering, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences (NAS), Rural Development Administration (RDA)
a농림 과학 기술원 국립 농업 과학원 농업 공학과 농업 연구원
b국립 농업 과학원 농업 공학과 박사 후 연구원, 농촌 진흥청 (RDA)
c국립 원예 초본 과학원 원예 작물 부 농업 연구원, 농촌 진흥청 (RDA)
d국립 농업 과학원 농업 공학과 연구원, 농촌 진흥청 (RDA)
† Corresponding authorTel.: +82-63-238-4161 Fax: +82-63-238-4145E-mail: yhchoi82@korea.kr
2019. pp. 23-31
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

Crop response to weather and internal water pressure changes is more sensitive to crop water stress than soil water content. Recently, its implementation to optimal irrigation scheduling has been receiving much attention. This study was conducted to determine and compare the theoretical crop water stress index (CWSI) using meterological data and canopy temperature collected from three different irrigation treatments, which were Tr-1 plot (rainfed), Tr-2 plot (50% of daily evapotranspiration (ET) irrigated) and Tr-3 plot (75% of daily evapotranspiration (ET) irrigated). The readings of canopy temperature and CWSI were significantly different among irrigation treatment schemes. The average canopy temperatures and CWSIs of Tr-1 and Tr-3 plots were 34.6°C and 32.6°C, 0.79 and 0.64, respectively. Solar radiation had the biggest correlation with CWSI (R=0.68) which was followed by wind speed, relative humidity and air temperature. Overall, the findings of this study indicated that canopy temperatures and CWSIs could be further used for irrigation scheduling for crop growth.

Keywords
Irrigation treatments
canopy temperature
crop water stress index (CWSI)
References

REFERENCES

1
N. Agam, Y. Cohen, J.A.J. Berni, V. Alchanatis, D. Kool, A. Dag, U. Yermiyahu and A. Ben-Gal, Agricultural Water Management, An insight to the performance of crop water stress index for olive trees., 118; 79-86 (2013)10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.004
2
J. Aguilar, D. Rogers and I. Kisekka, Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, Irrigation scheduling based on soil moisture sensors and evapotranspiration., 1(5); 1-6 (2015)10.4148/2378-5977.1087
3
S. Amatya, M. Karkee, A. K. Alva and B. Adhikari, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 2012 Annual Meeting, Hyperspectral imaging for detecting water sterss in potatoes., 29(July-1), Dallas, Texas.. (2012)10.13031/2013.42218
4
J. Bellvert, J. Marsal, J. Birona, V. Gonzalez-Dugo, E. Fereres, S. L. Ustin and P. J. Zarco-Tejada, Remote Sensing, Airborne thermal imagery to detect the seasonal evolution of crop water status in peach, nectarine and saturn peach orchards., 8(1); 39-56 (2016)10.3390/rs8010039
5
H. J. Bohnert, Q. Gong, P. Li and S. Ma, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms-Getting genomics going., 9(2); 180-188 (2006)10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.00316458043
6
A. Calera, I. Campos, A. Osann, G. D’Urso and M. Menenti, Sensors, Remote sensing for crop water management: From ET modeling to services for the end users., 17(5); 1104-1129 (2017)10.3390/s1705110428492515PMC5470494
7
Y. M. Choi, S. M. Jung and D. G. Choi, Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Effects of heavy rain during rainy season and drainage methods on soil water content, photosynthesis characteristics, and growth in ‘jinok’ and ‘campbell early’ grapes., 19(1); 1-9, (in Korean). (2017)10.5532/KJAFM.2017.19.1.131358718
8
J. Doorenbos and W. O. Pruitt, Crop Water Requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, 24; 15-29, Rome, Italy. (1977)
9
T. Dresselhaus and R. Hűckelhoven, Agronomy, Biotic and abiotic stress responses in crop plants., 8(11); 267-272 (2018)10.3390/agronomy8110267
10
Agricultural Water Mangement, Crop water stress index for assessing irrigation scheduling of drip irrigated broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica)., 98(1); 148-156 (2010)10.1016/j.agwat.2010.08.013
11
Y. Erdem, S. Şehíralí, T. Erdem and D. Kenar, Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Forestry, Determination of crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), 30(3); 195-202 (2006)
12
A. G. Garcia y, M. A. Abritta, C.M.T. Soler and A. Green, WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Water and heat stress: The effect on the growth and yield of maize and the impacts on irrgiation water., 185; 77-87 (2014)10.2495/SI140081
13
Y. Guisard, Crop canopy temperature as indicator of water stress: application to grapevines., Australia.. Doctoral thesis, Charles Sturt University. (2008)
14
S. B. Idso, R. D. Jackson, P. J. Pinter, R. J. Reginato and J. L. Hatfield, Agricultural Meteorology, Normalizing the stress-degreeday parameter for environmental variability., 24; 45-55 (1981)10.1016/0002-1571(81)90032-7
15
S. O. Ihuoma and C. A. Madramootoo, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Recent advances in crop water stress detection., 141; 267-275 (2017)10.1016/J.compag.2017.07.026
16
R. D. Jackson, S. B. Idso, R. J. Reginato and P. J. Pinter Jr, Water Resources Research, Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator., 17(4); 1133-1138 (1981)10.1029/WR017i004p01133
17
H. G. Jones, Advances in Botanical Research, Application of thermal imaging and infrared sensing in plant physiology and ecophysiology., 41; 107-163 (2004)10.1016/S0065-2296(04)41003-9
18
H. G. Jones, XXVIII International Horticultural Congress on Science and Horticulture for People (IHC2010): International Symposium on 922, Remote detection of crop water stress and distinguishing it from other stresses.; 23-34 (2010)10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.922.2
19
M. Kim, S. Kim, Y. Kim, Y. Choi and M. Seo, Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, Infrared estimation of canopy temperature as crop water stress indicator., 48(5); 499-504 (2015)10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.5.499
20
S. W. Kim, Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, Study on the estimation of project duty of water and facility capacity in upland irrigation - on the estimation of duty of water for the upland crops by the measurement of evapotranspiration., 30(4); 23-44, (in Korean). (1988)
21
S. Limpus, Department on Primary Industries and fisheries, Queensland.Isotropic and anisotropic characterisation of vegetable crops. (2009)
22
S. W. Nam, Y. S. Kim and D. U. Seo, Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory, Change in the plant temperature of tomato by fogging and airflow in plastic greenhouse., 23(1); 11-18, (in Korean). (2014)10.12791/KSBEC.2014.23.1.011
23
I. R. McCann, J. C. Stark and B. A. King, American Potato Journal, Evaluation and interpretation of the crop water stress index for well-watered potatoes., 69; 831-841 (1992)10.1007/BF02854191
24
S. O’Shaughnessy, S. R. Evett, P. D. Colaizzi and T. A. Howell, Agricultural Water Management, A crop water stress index and time threshold for automatic irrigation scheduling of grain sorghum., 107; 122-132 (2012)10.1016j.agwat.2012.01.018
25
Y. Osroosh, R. T. Peters, C. S. Campbell and Q. Zhang, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, Automatic irrigation scheduling of apple trees using theoretical crop water stress index with an innovative dynamic threshold., 118; 193-203 (2015)10.1016/j.compag.2015.09.006
26
J. C. O’Toole and J. L. Hatfield, Agronomy Journal, Effect of wind on the crop water stress index derived by infrared thermometry., 75; 811-817 (1983)10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050019x
27
Rural development administration (RDA), Agricultural technical note-Apple cultivation.; 144-145, (in Korean)., Jeonju, Korea.. (2016)
28
P. F. Scholander, H. T. Hammel, E. D. Bradstreet and E. A. Hemmingsen, Science, Sap pressure in vascular plants., 148(3668); 339-346 (1965)10.1126/science.148.3668.33917832103
29
E. Y. Song and J. H. Lee, Nanotechnology in Biomedical Science, Plant responses to environmental stresses., 32(4); 27-34, (in Korean). (2012)
30
Y. H. Woo, Moisture and measuring and control in soil and plant., https://www.af.ac.kr/planweb/board/download.9is?fileUid=0000000052e385d90152ed26d5432e9e&boardUid=816ac6da51a3db470151b3d169a5019b (2013)
31
P. J. Zarco-Tejada, V. González-Dugo and J.A.J. Berni, Remote sensing of Environment, Fluorescence, temperature and narrow-band indices acquired from a UAV platform for water stress detection using a micro-hyperspectral imager and a thermal camera., 117; 322-337 (2012)10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.007
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국농공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국농공학회논문집
  • Volume : 61
  • No :5
  • Pages :23-31
  • Received Date : 2019-07-24
  • Revised Date : 2019-08-19
  • Accepted Date : 2019-08-19
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2019.61.5.023
Journal Informaiton Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers Journal of Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crossref funder-registry
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close